For the majority of Americans, it seems, the machinations of the New World Order are beyond comprehension — although, that fog of confusion is slowly dissipating over time as the NWO operates more openly and the truth continues to reveal itself. For most, however, the why’s and how’s of it all are perhaps beyond what seems logical. Or, perhaps most of us are simply too content being cogs in the New World Order machine to even dare pull the curtain back on the Wizard. But to read The Franklin Cover-Up is to no longer have the luxury of keeping the curtain closed.
The Franklin Cover-Up focuses on events centered in Nebraska — events that involve the most powerful, moneyed people in the Nebraskan political and business communities participating in child abduction, molestation and slavery rings that are tied to an underground satanic cult network. All the while, these very same politicians and business leaders are working with the CIA to funnel money and drugs in, out and through the United States.
When people like former Nebraska State Senator John W. DeCamp (the author of this book) got involved — along with a few other very brave investigators, lawyers and politicians — to begin investigating the allegations of child abuse, pedophilia and satanic ritual killings, those people who started getting too close to the truth started dying. And all the while the FBI went out of its way to protect the accused pedophiles from their accusers — the children who stepped forward to tell their tales of molestation, torture, and forced participation in satanic rituals.
Why did the FBI step in to protect satanic pedophiles in Nebraska? Because this is a case that goes well beyond the state of Nebraska into the dark heart of the New World Order machine.
* * * * *
“What you have to understand, John, is that sometimes there are forces and events too big, too powerful, with so much at stake for other people or institutions, that you cannot do anything about them no matter how evil or wrong they are and no matter how dedicated or sincere you are or how much evidence you have. That is simply one of the hard facts of life you have to face. You have done your part. You have tried to expose the evil and wrongdoing. It has hurt you terribly. But it has not killed you up to this point. I am telling you, get out of this before it does. Sometimes things are just too big for us to deal with, and we have to step aside and let history take its course. For you, John, this is one of those times.” (p. ix-x)
— former CIA Director William E. Colby to author Senator John W. DeCamp
John W. DeCamp
Senator John W. DeCamp is an attorney, a Vietnam War vet and a 16-year Nebraska State Senator. DeCamp was honored by the White House for his role in “Operation Baby Lift” which evacuated 2,800 Vietnamese/American children orphaned in the war.
Senator DeCamp was elected to the Nebraska State Senate in 1971 while still serving in Vietnam (without ever having personally campaigned on U.S. soil). During his 16-year term, Senator DeCamp attended two parties thrown by Larry King, Republican Party activist and manager of Nebraska’s Franklin Community Federal Credit Union — the bank through which Mr. King was able to wield his formidable influence, and concurrently do the bidding of those above him within the NWO power structure. According to evidence and testimony presented in The Franklin Cover-Up, Larry King was the ringleader of the Franklin fiasco — facilitating the running of drugs, money and children through the NWO’s satanic meat grinder.
Senator DeCamp’s term in the Nebraska legislature ended in 1987. The following year, the Franklin Community Federal Credit Union was raided by the FBI and IRS — spurring the Nebraska legislature to launch the Franklin Committee and investigate the theft of millions of dollars that were unaccounted for in Franklin’s books. Nebraska Senator Loran Schmit became the committee chairman, and Mr. DeCamp was his private attorney. Mr. DeCamp also ended up as private attorney for Paul Bonacci, one of the youths who was victimized by the satanic/pedophile ring that operated in Nebraska via Larry King.
Mr. DeCamp has been intimately — even life-threateningly — tied into the Franklin story and cover-up ever since the case became public. He possesses an enormous storehouse of facts and primary source material on this case — along with a substantial amount of evidence that points directly to a cover-up by some of our nation’s most powerful institutions — namely, the FBI and the Justice Department. If there is anyone qualified to tell this story, it is Senator John DeCamp.
The Two Sides of the Franklin Story
On the one hand, the Franklin Community Federal Credit Union case is a financial one. When the the FBI and the IRS raided the credit union in November 1988, $40 million dollars was determined to be missing from the bank’s coffers. Later that same month, the Nebraska legislature voted to investigate the Franklin scandal.
With the Franklin Credit Union and Larry King under the spotlight, the allegations of child abuse linked to Mr. King could no longer be ignored. The Nebraska Foster Care Review Board (FCRB) and the Department of Social Services had been receiving victims’ testimony since 1985, yet their pleas to the authorities to take action had, until that time, been ignored.
“After the first session [of the Franklin Committee] , on December 12, 1988 Senator [Ernie] Chambers made a dramatic announcement about the probe. The investigation would go into not only financial wrongdoing, he said, but also the physical and sexual abuse of children by persons connected with Franklin.” (p. 56-57)
One week later, FCRB official Dennis Carlson gave eye-opening testimony:
“The nature of these allegations are something that is going to shock the Committee. They deal with cult activities, they deal with sacrifices of small children, they deal with sexual abuse…” (p. 57)
The FBI Protects Pedophiles
The FBI’s actions clearly showed that not only was the agency solely interested in prosecuting the financial side of the scandal, but FBI agents went out of their way to attempt to disprove the testimony of those children who bravely came forward to expose the abuse they suffered at the hands of Mr. King and his ilk. The FBI threatened the victim-witnesses with criminal prosecution if they didn’t recant their testimony.
With the threat of federal prosecution looming over his head, Troy Boner, one of the victim-witnesses, recanted. As a result, on July 23, 1990, the Omaha World-Herald newspaper trumpeted the banner headline: “Grand Jury Says Abuse Stories Were a ‘Carefully Crafted Hoax.'”
In the public eye, the allegations of child abuse and satanic ritual killings were now a closed case. The two other children victim-witnesses, Alisha Owen and Paul Bonacci, were found guilty of perjury and sentenced to as much as 27-years in prison.
According to Mr. Carlson, U.S. Attorney Tom Thalken said:
“…the federal authorities were investigating Mr. King…But their investigation was confined to the money issues, and they were not specifically investigating allegations of child abuse.” (p. 183)
In fact, according to one officer in the Omaha Police Department:
“…the [FBI] was concerned that our child pornography/abuse investigation might hamper their investigation…we were to either ‘slow down or back off’ in our investigation…” (p. 183)
It seems clear that the FBI wanted the Franklin scandal to be only about the money — and FBI agents went well out of their way to ensure that.
In light of this, former special agent-in-charge of the Bureau’s Los Angeles Field Division, Ted Gunderson’s observation about FBI policy becomes quite telling:
“The FBI has an accurate count of the number of automobiles stolen every year. It knows the number of homicides, rapes, and robberies, but the FBI has no idea of the number of children who disappear every year. They simply do not ask for the statistics. Every month, every major police department in the United States files its uniform crime statistics with the FBI. It would be simple for the bureau to add one more column to the statistics and get a breakdown of every reported case of missing children — not to even mention children who are kidnapped for ritualistic purposes, and, in some cases, murdered. I am convinced that the FBI does not ask for these statistics because they do not want to see them. They would be confronted with an instant public outcry for action, because the figures would show a major social problem. That problem would demand action.” (p.xxi)
* * * * *
“The Franklin investigators had lifted a corner of the rug, under which could be glimpsed a national and international organized crime syndicate, engaged in pedophilia, pornography, satanism, drugs, and money-laundering, and protected, as their own limited investigation began to show, by federal authorities.
“Pull a thread on any corner of this vast, seamless web, and the whole begins to unravel.” (p. 228)
How Far Does This Scandal Reach?
Testimony by the children victim-witnesses in the Franklin scandal demonstrated clearly that the issue was not localized to Nebraska politics. Rather, the children (most notably the ones that were plucked from Boys Town, a large orphanage outside of Omaha) were often whisked around the country to be the sexual party favors at political fund raising affairs and parties. According to the children’s testimonies, Larry King was the man in charge of supplying children on many occasions.
While Mr. King was, on the one hand, shuffling children around the country to be used as sex slaves, his credit union was busy funneling funds for the CIA.
“Former political associates of King, sources on Capitol Hill, and intelligence specialists suggest that Larry King was one of dozens of owners and directors of savings and loans and other financial institutions, used by the CIA to help finance covert operations. From their information, a picture takes shape.
“S&L managers, allegedly including King, would secretly lend CIA operatives bundles of depositors’ money, supposedly on a 30-day basis. In some instances, hundreds of thousands and even millions of these dollars would be flown out of the United States, to destinations such as Switzerland and the Bahamas. The money would be invested for profit in short-term high-yield financial instruments or other overseas hot-money schemes. Before federal auditors could notice any money missing, it would be returned. Some of the profit would be used to pay off the cooperating financial officer and other intermediaries. The rest was funneled into slush funds for covert operations.” (p. 172-173)
Ultimately, this financial activity tied into the Iran-Contra affair — which itself leads to then-Vice President (and former CIA boss) George H.W. Bush.
Following the money, however, is the easy part. Linking Mr. King’s satanic pedophilia to the White House, however, isn’t quite as cut and dry. Nevertheless, with Paul Bonacci’s testimony citing Mr. King as the point man during the 200-300 trips to various parts of the country to be used as a sex slave during political parties, Mr. King’s rise within the Republican power structure starts looking more than a little suspicious.
According to Omaha Star newspaper, in 1983:
“Chairman King has accepted a position in the Reagan/Bush re-electioin campaign. He was appointed by National Black Republican Council Chairperson LeGree Daniels, who was named Chairperson of the Black Voters for the Campaign, in the Reagan/Bush ’84 re-election bid…In brief this means that Mr. King will be responsible for meeting with the Party officials and the Black Republican leadership within each of the 17 targeted states. He will coordinate the efforts of these groups in support of the Reagan/Bush campaign…Mr. King will also be traveling to the 17 targeted states when President Reagan does, to draw state party officials and Black Republican leadership together.
“Mr. King has also accepted the Chairmanship of the National Black Republican Council, Development Committee for Fund Raising.”
It ought to raise red flags that the man most notorious for providing children to be used as sex slaves at political parties was given the chairmanship of fund raising for the National Black Republican Council. It’s like we’re just a short step away here from an official Republican sanction of political pedophilia parties.
The case of pedophilia against Mr. King and the public investigation into the dark heart of satanic ritual killings ended when Troy Boner recanted his testimony. The financial investigation continued, however, and Mr. King ended up in prison for embezzlement, conspiracy and making false financial record entries — a 15-year sentence under a plea bargain arrangement reached prior to Mr. King going to trial.
No trial meant that the evidence of child abuse was never presented in any court.
“As [Alisha Owens] remarked, she will be in jail longer than Larry King.” (p. 225)
The cover-up of child abuse, satanism and murder in Nebraska was successful … and one can only assume that the perpetrators, to this day, continue to engage in the horrific crimes detailed by the survivor testimony in this book.
I’m sure this idea is already out there, but at the time of the economic crash of 2008, I had no idea why we had a housing bubble that suddenly burst and destroyed the American economy.
After watching Bill Still’s brilliant documentaries The Money Masters and The Secret of Oz, I now have a much better understanding of monetary policy. So I’m going to succinctly explain the crash of 2008. If you remember, the media told us that the reasons behind the crash were far too complicated to explain, what with credit-default swaps and toxic assets and all sorts of fiduciary jargon that was meant to confuse an issue that, at its heart, is clear and simple.
It all has to do with, as Mr. Still puts it, who controls the money supply. When those who control the money supply provide enough money into the system for the system to grow, we have good years. When those who control the money supply contract that supply, we have lean years. The Federal Reserve controls the ebb and flow of the money supply via interest rates. The chart above shows the history of the Fed’s interest rate policy over that past 55+ years.
Before we get to the crash of 2008, I want to make a quick point about something that George W. Bush said when he first took office in 2001. I remember this time quite clearly. We had just finished two terms of economic prosperity that the Clinton administration rode through like wave surfers. If you notice the chart above, the Fed began lowering interest rates a little bit in 1990, then the rates plunged starting in 1992, releasing the constraints on the flow of money that facilitated the technology and dot.com boom which was just around the corner. In 1995, the dot.com bubble officially began and the Fed began raising the interest rates. It’s certainly logical to think that the Fed was trying to rein in the free spending of the bubble. But it’s interesting to note in the chart above that interest rates were raised significantly and quickly at the end of 1999 through to 2001 – well beyond the burst of the dot.com bubble in March, 2000.
Although the bubble had burst in 2000, its effects were generally limited to the investor class. Our government was operating with budget surpluses at the time! So it seemed puzzling to me that after Bush took office, he started making claims about our economy heading towards a recession. Here’s a quote from one of his speeches in March 2001:
“Tax relief is central to my plan to encourage economic growth, and we can proceed with tax relief without fear of budget deficits, even if the economy softens. Projections for the surplus in my budget are cautious and conservative. They already assume an economic slowdown in the year 2001. Even if the slowdown were to turn into a recession similar to that of 1990 and ’91, the Congressional Budget Office projects that the 10-year surplus would shrink by only 2 percent, from a little more than 5.6 trillion to a little less than 5.5 trillion.” (source: presidency.ucsb.edu)
Bush’s outlook on the economy predicted an economic slowdown because he knew that the Fed would continue to raise interest rates — and thereby contracting the money supply. I think it’s also worth noting in the chart above that the recession of 1990 and 1991 to which President Bush alludes follows a spike in interest rates by the Fed — another contraction of money followed by an economic slowdown.
So if we look at the chart above around the end of 2001, just after the event of 9/11, the Fed drops the interest rate like a lead balloon. I’m sure that the reasoning was to spur economic activity following the attacks of 9/11 … and perhaps, as well, to make wartime government borrowing more attractive.
It also facilitated the buying of houses and property for little to no money down, with low variable payments and attractive initial offers. People bought on credit. Interest rates were low. The economy was vibrant and active.
Then, at the end of 2004, the Fed began raising the interest rates sharply. People’s variable rate mortgages shot through the roof — beyond what they were able to afford. Did the Fed help these people by lowering the rates? No, they flatlined the rates sometime in 2006 and held them steady until 2008 when enough people defaulted on their loans to collapse the banking industry.
So We, the People, then had to bail out the banks because, as a result of the Fed’s interest rate spike, people were defaulting on their loans.
Ever wonder would have happened if we didn’t bail out the banking system? Here’s what Congressman Brad Sherman [D-CA] said on October 2, 2008:
“The only way they can pass this bill is by creating and sustaining a panic atmosphere. That atmosphere is not justified. Many of us were told in private conversations that if we voted against this bill, on Monday, that the sky would fall, the market would fall two or three thousand points the first day, another couple thousand the second day. And a few members were even told that there would be martial law in America if we voted no.”