My letter to Senator Barbara Boxer
Posted by esotericreader
My letter to Senator Boxer
August 4, 2012
Senator Boxer,
I am curious to know what your position is on the Federal Reserve – a privately held banking institution that conducts its business for the private profit of its private shareholders.
I’m sure that you are well aware that whenever the US Treasury exchanges bonds for Federal Reserve Notes, it does so with the debt of those interest-bearing bonds placed on the backs of the American taxpayer.
Our national debt is soaring out of control because of the debt associated with the creation of Federal Reserve Notes. The Fed also has complete control of the rise and fall of our economy thanks to its completely un-checked power to determine interest rates.
I’m also quite sure that you’re well aware that the Fed flatlined interest rates in 2006 (after a stiff spike that drove people’s variable rate mortgage payments through the roof) and held them steady until enough people defaulted on their mortgages to collapse the banking industry.
Meanwhile, we continue to borrow from the Fed in order to prop up an economy that OWES (to the bankers) MORE IN DEBT THAN IT CAN PRODUCE IN GDP.
As your constituent, I am very curious as to what direct action you are or have been taking in light of this. Or if you plan to do anything at all.
It is commonly said among your constituents and others that Congress is bought off. Do you have any intention of wresting monetary policy from the hands of the bankers who have clearly demonstrated ill will in abusing that power to subjugate We, the People to a vicious cycle of debt creation that WE WILL NEVER BE ABLE TO PAY BACK.
I do hope that your heart is in the right place. The money-issuing power of this nation belongs in the hands of the People – not the banks. Unfortunately, we are currently living in a Plutocracy because we have ceded control of our money supply to the banking class.
Perhaps you can demonstrate that Democracy is not yet completely dead and take action towards what is probably the SINGLE MOST IMPORTANT ISSUE THAT AFFECTS EVERY AMERICAN.
We have to get rid of the Federal Reserve and the Fractional Reserve Lending system that allows banks to create money out of thin air.
With all due respect, I’d like to suggest a pair of documentaries by a brilliant man named Bill Still. They are:
1) “The Money Masters” (older and more detailed)
2) “The Secret of Oz” (shorter, but more current)
Both of the documentaries detail the history of how the central bankers have attempted to establish a central private banking system in the United States ever since this country was born. They finally succeeded in 1913 with the Federal Reserve Act.
More importantly, both documentaries offer genuine solutions to this problem.
We can get out of this mess. We don’t need to keep passing on an impossibly bloated debt to future generations.
Let’s make this the generation where the people of America truly showed that the People of the world can be free.
The interest that we as a country pay to these bankers every year could feed the world. We could wipe out global poverty if we weren’t indebted to the banking class.
Let’s do the right thing. Let’s end this charade. Let’s start talking about things that really matter.
Your constituency is quickly waking up to the truth of what’s going on behind the scenes.
As more and more people wake up, eyes will open at an exponential rate.
If you are actively involved in addressing the issues I discuss in this email, please let me know how I can support your actions.
I also want to let you know that I will be posting this email to you on my public online blog.
I will also be posting any reply you send on my blog as well.
I think it will be important for the public to see how our government representatives engage this discussion.
I look forward to your reply.
Warmly,
Marc Star
Posted on August 4, 2012, in Finance, New World Order and tagged barbara boxer, congress, conspiracy, democracy, economy, federal reserve, illuminati, monetary policy, new world order, secret government, senate, senator, the fed. Bookmark the permalink. 3 Comments.
Exellent letter, Marc.
I recently e-mailed my representative in the U.S Congress (Anna Eshoo, D-CA), in support of Rep. Paul’s “Audit the FED” legislation,” H.R. 459, citing Edward Griffin’s book, Creature From Jekyll Island. She replied that in essence there is no need of such legislation because the FED is already required to be accoutable to the GAO. Here, in part, is her reply:
“…Many are under the impression that under current law, the Federal Reserve’s activities are immune to audit, transparency, or public scrutiny. This is false.
Since 1978, the Federal Reserve has been required by law to comply with financial audits conducted by the Government Accountability Office (GAO) . The bank has complied in full—and regular, public audits have been completed since that date. In 2010, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act greatly expanded the types of audits that may be conducted, as well as the data that the Federal Reserve must periodically disclose to the public.
For example, Dodd-Frank requires the GAO to fully audit all emergency financial assistance (or “bailouts”) conducted during the financial crisis. It also requires the F ederal Reserve to publicly post on its website all GAO reports, annual financial statements, financial reporting, internal controls, emergency credit borrowers and counterparties, discount lending programs, and open market operations. This is the type of transparency many of my constituents have asked for, and I’m pleased the current law ensures it.
One major area remains where the Federal Reserve is not transparent : internal deliberations on monetary policy matters. Many who believe these deliberations should be conducted in the open do so because they question the legitimacy of modern monetary policy itself , believing our nation should return to a fixed-currency system , such as the gold standard.”
I felt bested after reading her reply letter, like a cowering little dog , tail tucked between his legs.
I know that this isn’t the whole story about the FED’s shenanigans, like engineered inflation, for example, but how would you retort her?
I like your site, just became acquainted via David Icke Headlines.
Best to you,
Pete
Hi Pete,
Thank you, and I applaud you for contacting your rep. I, too, must contact my congressional rep (Karen Bass, D-CA) and your action has inspired me to do so. I never really expected a reply from Senator Boxer (and haven’t received one) … but at the same time, I don’t really expect that our House reps have any muscle at all to do anything that could encroach on the Fed’s unchecked power. Nevertheless, it’s time for me to engage a rep from whom I might possibly get a reply.
As far as Ron Paul’s “Audit the Fed” legislation … my gut feeling is that such legislation is just a smokescreen. In my view, politicians don’t reach the high-profile ranks like Mr. Paul unless they’ve already agreed to play the game (or the Cabal has some sort of blackmail material in the wings ready to expose said politician … so they play the game just to keep their jobs in check). My feeling is that Mr. Paul is playing the role of the “People’s Candidate,” appealing to those of us who feel it’s time to take back our government. But as your representative has shown, Mr. Paul’s “Audit the Fed” legislation simply gives our politician’s political cover. They can vote for the legislation and thus appeal to our sense of people power, or they can dismiss it as redundant. Either way, nothing gets done.
Mr. Paul used to claim to want to end the Fed and abolish the IRS. I haven’t been following him much in the past couple years, but I’d be surprised if he’s still singing the same tune. If he is, I’m confident he is just making false claims in hopes of making it to the White House … where he would simply renege on his promises just as Obama (and every prior President) has.
I would suggest responding your Rep in a positive manner. Start off by agreeing with her wholeheartedly that those who question the legitimacy of modern monetary policy in support of the gold standard are, indeed, misguided. The gold standard would only serve to empower those who control the supply of the gold. And those who control the supply of gold would be able to artificially inflate or deflate our economy in the same way that the Fed does today simply by releasing or constraining the flow of the precious metal.
Ask her if she currently supports the debt-creation model of our current monetary policy. Ask her if she is aware that our national debt results from the compounding interest created as a result of the issuance of Federal Reserve Notes. Ask her why she feels it is is necessary for the Federal Reserve to create our money and put our nation in debt when our government has the constitutionally mandated power to do the same in a debt-free manner. Ask her if she is aware that our personal income taxes are used towards paying down the debt created by the issuance of Federal Reserve Notes. (It is no coincidence that the IRS began operation in 1913, the same year that the Federal Reserve Act was passed.) And finally, ask her if she is aware of the intense inflationary pressures that result from the banking system’s Fractional Reserve Lending (which allows banks to lend ten-times more than they have in actual reserves).
Thomas Edison once said, “If our nation can issue a dollar bond, it can issue a dollar bill.” Currently our nation only issues bonds. In exchange for those interest-bearing bonds, the Federal Reserve issues its Federal Reserve Notes. Few people in this country understand this simple process and that is why the Fed has been allowed to get away with it for so long.
I don’t think it’s a radical idea to question modern monetary policy. Inflation is a serious burden on the average person and our nation is hopelessly in debt. I would hardly call modern monetary policy a success. To do so, and to continue to defend and support a failing system is, at best, less than honest and shows a disregard for the people upon whom this modern monetary policy weighs down.
There is a solution, however, and it is beautiful – like an orange-hued sunrise over a battle-scarred land. It begins with enacting legislation that forbids the United States Government from borrowing money. That, in itself, ends the money-issuing power of the Federal Reserve. At the same time, the US Treasury takes back its constitutionally mandated responsibility and begins issuing lawful money (in addition to the coins that it currently produces). As the government uses that money to pay down its national debt, the Fractional Reserve banking system is proportionally phased out – to counteract the inflationary influences of the printing of the new United States bills. Ultimately, banks will only have the power to lend what they actually have in their reserves. (Imagine that!!)
It is then the government’s responsibility to manage the issuance of lawful money in accordance with the gross national production power of the country. And, of course, the government will have to keep a vigilant eye on the international bankers who have, throughout history, shown a predilection towards counterfeiting national currencies over which they don’t have centralized control. (They are master counterfeiters. [Some would call Federal Reserve Notes counterfeit money!!] And they counterfeit to devalue a nation’s currency, throw that nation into financial despair, and then step-in with their “stabilizing” solution of a central banking system. It is classic Problem-Reaction-Solution, as described by Mr. Icke, and they have been doing it for hundreds of years.)
If you haven’t yet seen the following two documentaries by Bill Still, I highly recommend watching both:
1) “The Money Masters” (older and more detailed)
2) “The Secret of Oz” (shorter, but more current)
I know that the “Oz” documentary is still on YouTube. “Money Masters” may have been taken down.
Warm Regards,
Marc
“If only I had known how absolutely evil it is to save money, invset it and expect a fair return.”That’s actually exactly the point of inflation. If it weren’t for inflation there would be zero impetus for you to invset your productivity surplus, you would simply stockpile it. Even when you are ‘saving’ money you are really invseting it in a bank or some other institution so that it can be invseted on your behalf. We need to spur invsetment in productivity enhancements, and increased spending is by and large the most efficient way to go about that. Hopefully with all this invsetment we’ll hit a homerun. Like the transistor or a/c power or the spinning jenny. Something that boosts productivity exponentially.